Print version
Quarter Marred by Geopolitical Risk
For three months the Dow has been erratic, losing or gaining more than 100 points in one day no fewer than seven times each way. During March the index corrected more than 600 points, about 5.5%. Most of the negative days were the result of terrorist activities or threats of terrorism.

The truth is this first quarter produced very strong earnings reports, which also provided positive guidance regarding future earnings. Except for stagnancy in employment numbers, economic news has supported optimism: evidence of corporate spending on IT and equipment, IPOs coming to market again, and little sign of inflation (although recent prices of oil and gas and commodities like copper, silver, and gold have reached new highs).

But geopolitical risk keeps taking the wind out of the sails of the stock market’s performance. Technology stocks have taken the brunt of the beating. Since they typically are awarded higher prices to earnings ratios than the companies of other sectors, the nervous investor has been selling these riskier names and looking for safer investments. The Nasdaq index, which is comprised of predominantly tech and biotech stocks, corrected almost 8% from its high this year to its close on 31 March.

Usually large cap pharmaceutical stocks would benefit from this move away from technology, but this group has had its own problems recently. Will there be changes in Medicare that result in lower prescription drug prices? How will the importation of cheaper pharmaceuticals from other countries play out? If Bush doesn’t win, will new legislation squelch the profits of big drug companies?

Bottom line: fundamentals are still good for many quality companies; the outlook for the rest of this year is also good for these companies. But there is no accounting for the odds or impact of the next big geopolitical crisis. Your judgment of this potential is personal.

If your concern is great, you will probably want to reduce risk in your portfolio, eliminating or reducing those holdings that are more speculative or that depend on a robust economy (tech, biotech, consumer discretionary), and add to positions that are more defensive, less volatile, and pay dividends (energy, healthcare, industrials). Since my recommendation list is based on growth, you won’t find many conservative, dividend-paying stocks on it. There are some good candidates (BP and ChevronTexaco) in my recent article “Energy Stocks for 2004 and Beyond”.